StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

A Farmer Laments the Nature of Sacrifice

2/8/2014

0 Comments

 
Sharon, an organic farmer from north central Kansas, recently had the opportunity to pause and ponder one of nature's wonders on her way to work.  Here are her words:

"Oh beautiful for spacious skies... " What a perfect Kodak moment! As I drove into town to my off the farm job, I was so lucky to witness yet another of Mother Nature's magic moments. I am so grateful that I was born and raised and returned back to our old family farm located in North Central Kansas. Most of you already know from geography class, that puts me on the western edge of that grand land many of us call Mayberry. Watching Mother Nature produce some of the most breathtaking artwork is one of the many perks of living out here, in the "boonies". I am so very blessed.

It's just too bad the next time many of us will see this spectacular and rare sight, the pasture fence will most likely be upstaged by 150'-200' tall, steel lattice poles with high voltage transmission lines carrying 3x the power of Hoover Dam from one end of our great state to the other and into our just as great, neighboring states. And they will stand there for--"FOREVER"!

We are assured they will be carrying all this clean? green energy which will be carried “out," not in or throughout our state. But we needn't worry, the company tells us. All is well, even though a project of this magnitude has never been built before and this company has never built a high voltage transmission line of any size.

The company and their expert witnesses assure us that we are in good hands, all is safe, there are no dangers, for "forever" and ever. Our children's grandchildren will just be fine, don't worry. They may never get to see or even know what an eagle is, nor the family farm. But what's a few sacrifices, for the greater good?

While I have spent many hours reading, re-reading, researching, searching for truth, there's still one problem I can't quite figure out in all of this. Exactly what is the "greater good" or maybe I should ask, for whom is this greater good? I'm certain Eminent Domain will let me know soon enough. Let's hope by then, it's not too late!
0 Comments

News Flash:  Our Grid is Vulnerable

2/5/2014

7 Comments

 
Well, duh.

Big article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, Assault on California Power Station Raises Alarm on Potential for Terrorism, that reports on a coordinated attack at a California substation that sounds like a scene from an action film.

According to the article, the information came from former FERC Commissioner Jon Wellinghoff, who has taken up lurking around substations in his dotage.  Apparently Wellinghoff was horrified at the substation attack last April and
the subsequent realization that our grid is astonishingly vulnerable and there's not much FERC can do about it.

I know what FERC can do about it...  Stop promoting centralized generation and an increasing network of high voltage transmission lines to trade electricity like a commodity from coast to coast!


If you think substations are vulnerable, spend a few minutes pondering the thousands of miles of high voltage transmission lines strung everywhere.  True, an attack on one remote tower may not have much effect and could be easily fixed, but what about a coordinated attack on hundreds of towers that supply our cities at the same time?


Our military isn't dumb enough to rely on a power supply this vulnerable, so why should we?  As far back as 2007, the U.S. military was studying electric grid vulnerability and concluded that "distributed generation" (yes, they used quotes, like Dr. Evil with his "laser") was our best defense.

And so it is - our military is practicing distributed generation.


So, when is Congress going to put a stop to the transmission feeding frenzy and start protecting the rest of us?


7 Comments

Missouri Grain Belt Express Opponents Hit It Out of The Park on First Swing

2/5/2014

10 Comments

 
When Clean Line Energy's Grain Belt Express shell company recently filed a notice of intent with the Missouri Public Service Commission, opposition to the project exploded.

Hundreds of landowners came together at public education meetings and the media took notice.  This video was part of a story in the Kansas City Star. 
The video has drawn the attention of affected landowners, citizens, elected officials, and other entities I'm not at liberty to reveal.  Ut-oh, Grain Belt Express, another race lost right at the starting gate!  Missouri may be your worst nightmare yet!  You see, the opposition to your projects is getting better and more knowledgeable.  And there are thousands of us in multiple states.

The video has also drawn the fascination of other transmission opposition groups who want to replicate it.  But first, they have to determine why this video works so well.

It's the people.  The KC Star used a variety of interests and personalities in their video.  The people are very, very real.  They aren't making complicated arguments, they are simply speaking from the heart.  The emotion is raw and the viewer identifies with the landowners.

Contrast the landowners with the little vignettes of Grain Belt manager Mark Lawlor that have been interspersed here and there.  At best, he's Waldo come to life, creeping around in all sorts of places, hoping you'll notice him.  At worst, he's been called an unblinking alien by someone who viewed the video.  Point here is that he's emotionless and boring and comes off as an uncaring corporate stooge.
It's that contrast that makes this video work so well.  None of the participants had any idea during the filming that the finished product would be so brilliantly edited.  It's pure kismet, and it's a home run start to Missouri's successful battle against Grain Belt Express.  Well done, Missouri, well done!
10 Comments

Iowa Legislators Propose Legislation to Stop RICL

2/4/2014

1 Comment

 
Iowa legislators have had enough Rock Island Clean Line.  In January, legislation to limit the use of eminent domain was introduced, spurred by RICL's proposal to take nearly 400 miles of right-of-way in the state.
The target of their legislation is the Rock Island Clean Line, a $2 billion, 500-mile overhead direct current transmission line.

Rogers called private property rights “critically important to our way of life.”

“Many farmers in my district live and work on land that has been in their family for generations, and they want to allow their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren to continue to farm that land and feed the world,” Rogers said. “Our laws must adequately protect their property rights.”
One bill requires that any power line project requesting eminent domain authority must deliver at least 25% of its power to consumers in Iowa.  RICL intends to export power from northwest Iowa direct to eastern Illinois, where it will be interconnected with PJM Interconnection, the regional grid operator for mid-Atlantic eastern states.

The second bill requires legislative approval of any request to bifurcate an application for a transmission project in order to separate the determination of need from the request for eminent domain authority.  RICL tried to use bifurcation to force landowners into a weak negotiating position for rights-of-way, but was rejected by the Iowa Utilities Board.

Be sure to check the lobbyist declarations on both these bills.  Clean Line doesn't appear to be happy about them.  I suppose fair is fair though... Iowans don't seem to be very happy about RICL, either.

I wonder if our Clean Line heroes envisioned this kind of opposition when planning their get-rich-quick power line scheme back in 2011?  I've heard it said that they gleefully dismissed any possibility of trouble, expecting nothing more than "a couple of ticked off farmers."  Personally, I'd never want to tick off any farmers.  They have pitchforks.  And I like the food they grow.

And speaking of eminent domain, legislators in Missouri are livid over the Arkansas Public Service Commission's approval of a SWEPCO transmission route through 25 miles of Missouri.  Within 10 days of the APSC decision, legislators had proposed:
The bill states that “the Missouri Public Service commission shall lack jurisdiction to approve the construction of any electric facilities to be built in accordance with Arkansas Public Service Commission Order 33, Docket Number 13-041-U, authorizing Route 109 as a ‘reasonable route’ for the construction of new three hundred forty-five kilovolt electric transmission lines.”
The overbuilding of new transmission of questionable necessity as a utility or investor profit center has finally gone too far.  The people have had enough of this nonsense and their elected representatives are taking action.  This transmission craze is now making it difficult to build ANY transmission, even that which may actually be needed.  Their cash cow is down and slowly bleeding to death, and it's their own fault.  Ooops.
1 Comment

Missouri Opposes Grain Belt Express Transmission Line

1/29/2014

2 Comments

 
Clean Line Energy's Grain Belt Express transmission project proposes to plow through fifteen (15) counties in Missouri on its route from southwestern Kansas to western Indiana.

Clean Line has indeed awoken the sleeping giant, or as they like to think of it "poked the bear."


On January 13, 2014, Clean Line's Grain Belt Express subsidiary filed a Notice of Intended Case Filing with the Missouri Public Service Commission.  The notice is legally necessary at least 60 days prior to filing its application to be granted public utility status and a certificate to own and operate the project in Missouri.
  You can participate in this process once the application is filed.

For now, you can file your comments about this case with the PSC
on Docket No. EA-2014-0207.  Click the "Public Comments" tab on the horizontal menu of the MO PSC's EFIS and fill out the form.  You can also mail your comments to the PSC.  Be sure to mark them with the case number.

You can also let Missouri Governor Jay Nixon know that you do not support this project.  Click here to submit your comments online.


The good people of Missouri are standing up and banding together in record numbers to successfully stop this incredibly destructive project.

If you have questions or concerns about the Grain Belt Express, get in touch with Block Grain Belt Express to be connected with a group in your local area, and to find out how you can defend your interests.

This project is far from "a done deal," and prospects for future approval continue to dim with each citizen of Missouri who joins together with others to create a formidable chain of opposition that cannot be broken.

Citizen action has stopped transmission projects and can stop Grain Belt Express!  Take action now!
2 Comments

Ireland Struggles With Misguided Energy Policy & Big Wind Greed

1/27/2014

0 Comments

 
Well, deja vu, folks!

It seems that the Midwest shares a common struggle with the people of Ireland.

A recent editorial in Ireland's Independent reads like something penned in the central U.S.:
The expected growth in electricity demand has not materialised. There is now a wide and growing margin of generation capacity over demand. A new gas-fired plant was commissioned last year and another one is due to come on stream towards the end of 2014. The construction of new wind-farms continues apace. While some of the older stations are coming to the end of their useful lives, none are on their last legs. If Ireland was left to its own devices, there would be no urgency about adding more generation capacity for many years to come.

*snip*

Plans by Eirgrid to upgrade the high voltage transmission network, and in particular to build three major lines in the southeast, the west and a new North-South line, reflect both the ongoing need to renew and strengthen the network but also the perceived requirement to accommodate additional wind-power units. If the Government's wind targets are excessively ambitious, some of the grid projects might not be needed. There is also a push from wind-energy companies, including State companies, to build more capacity designed for exporting power to the UK. If these plans go ahead, there would be yet more high voltage lines, on top of Eirgrid's proposals, from the midlands to the east coast, as well as further undersea interconnection to Britain.

Energy infrastructure is both expensive and controversial. *snip* Plans for new transmission lines, extra wind-farms and onshore gas exploration are meeting widespread resistance around the country and promise to dominate the local and European Parliament elections in May.

If energy infrastructure projects make economic sense, the political system must arbitrate the health, safety and environmental concerns that will inevitably, and quite properly, be raised. It is sometimes tempting to regard the objectors as locally oriented nimbies seeking to blackmail politicians who are pursuing necessary national priorities. Indeed this is hinted at in the government line on pylons and wind-farms, which takes it as read that the various projects are necessary to meet the requirements of development. But if the economic justification for the projects is flimsy, the balance of the argument is altered. In Ireland it has not been demonstrated that the continuing push for ever-greater reliance on intermittent wind-generated electricity makes economic sense, nor is it clear that wind is the least-cost path to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
BINGO!

So, it's not a need issue, it's a GREED issue, just like it is here in the U.S.
0 Comments

Wisconsin Ratepayers Ask States to Consider Non-Transmission Alternatives in Planning for Peak Load

1/27/2014

0 Comments

 
Rob Danielson of SOUL of Wisconsin, and Deb Severson of Citizens' Energy Task Force, are asking state regulators to join them in supporting financially and environmentally sustainable energy solutions.

In a recent editorial in The Wisconsin State Journal, the pair of ratepayer advocates is asking the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to make utilities accountable for the financial and community costs of building more transmission, and for using the term “reliability” so loosely that ratepayers are led to think these lines are about “keeping the lights on.”

Danielson and Severson contend that energy efficiency contributes to grid reliability by reducing stress on the grid. Efficiency is also the best way to save ratepayers’ money and reduce our carbon footprint. It has no negative impacts, other than reducing utility profits.

Utilities and state regulators need to acknowledge how cost-effective it is to shave peak-demand during those very limited hours in the summer or winter when demand spikes — and that this, too, increases grid reliability. Paying customers to turn off their air conditioners for 15 minutes, or an industrial customer to use back-up diesel, makes far more economic sense than spending billions to add wires to bring in rarely needed extra power. Energy spikes can also be addressed by adding local renewables, which have the added benefit of creating additional local, ongoing jobs.

There are many ways to address need without building new transmmission, and Danielson and Severson are asking for equal consideration of them. Consumers are demanding that ratepayer and community interests — not utility and Wall Street profits — drive our future transmission planning decisions.

0 Comments

Will Midwest States Become the Next West Virginia?

1/23/2014

0 Comments

 
The West Virginia water crisis has generated a whole bunch of national media attention on West Virginia's status as the east coast's dumping ground.

This isn't a new story, it's actually a very old story.  The long and short of it is that the people and environment of West Virginia have been prostituted to out-of-state business interests by their own elected officials.  The people of West Virginia have long sacrificed for the needs of others, and all they have to show for it is crushing poverty and a fouled environment.  All the money ends up in the pockets of its out-of-state overlords.  I told this story to the people of Illinois during a public hearing on the Rock Island Clean Line project last fall.

Now, Salon tells West Virginia's story to the rest of the country.

Is there a lesson to be learned here?  How easily could wind-rich Midwest states be substituted for West Virginia in this article?
The people of West Virginia had made clear demands: put land and people first.  The companies did neither, but continued on their profit-driven rampage destroying huge swaths of the West Virginia mountains – one of the world’s most beautiful landscapes – with mountaintop removal for cheaper access to coal, exposing residents to toxic air pollution in order to provide the rest of the nation with cheap energy.  The decisions made in the early 1970s are what got us here today, with hundreds of thousands of people spending days unsure when they would be able to drink their water again, with many remaining unsure as pipe flushing and other cleanup procedures have been ineffective.
Think huge industrial wind farms and miles and miles of high voltage transmission lines are harmless?

Wind farms could endanger small aircraft
Wind turbines throw ice
Wind farms can drive you crazy
Wind farms have a multitude of adverse effects

New high voltage transmission lines also have adverse effects and will take thousands of acres of the nation's most productive farm land out of production.


The people of Illinois, Iowa, Kansas and Missouri have made clear demands:  put the land and people first.  Clean Line Energy Partners have done neither, but continue on their profit-driven rampage intent on destroying huge swaths of America's farmland -- one of the world's most productive food producers -- with acres of wind farms and miles of transmission lines for cheaper access to renewable electricity, exposing residents to economic and health risks in order to provide the rest of the nation with cheap energy.  The decisions made today will be the history of tomorrow.

And if we don't learn from history, we are bound to repeat it.

0 Comments

How Clean Energy Is Killing Itself

1/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Remember when clean energy was just a cute little infant that everyone adored?  Pampered with government incentives and pats on the head by the media and celebrities, clean energy was the epitome of positive change.  Eventually, clean energy cut teeth and learned to walk, and people adored it more than ever.

Now clean energy has entered its sullen, teen aged years and suddenly it's not so cherubic anymore.  Clean energy has become demanding, shrill and arrogant, and average Americans are turning away.  The messenger is killing the message.

Last week, a collection of environmental interest groups berated President Obama for not moving fast enough on climate change to suit their environmental goals.

A chastising response from Obama advisor John Podesta ended with this sentence:
In the meantime, we will continue to welcome your advice, based on your very long  experience on how to convince the American
public of the need and opportunity to  transform dirty energy systems to ones that  are cleaner and more efficient.
Was that a tongue-in-cheek dig at the way these organizations may be driving away the American people with their militant concentration on their own management goals, instead of issues that matter to the members who keep the organization solvent?  These environmental organizations may have lost touch with the American public, and perhaps the only thing they are convincing them of lately is to cancel their memberships and turn their backs.

It's taken us hundreds of years to get to this point, and climate change isn't going to be fixed this month, this year, or maybe even this century.  Certainly not within the lifetimes of the current crop of arrogant clean energy advocates pouring out of our educational system, who seem to believe that arrogant disparagement is a useful tool to convince others to adopt their own sense of urgency in realizing their personal clean energy goals.

The false sense of urgency being pushed on the American public would require them to buy into the rhetoric that clean energy must be accomplished right now by plunging headlong into enabling big wind's big profits, and fostering social injustice by taking from one segment of society in order to make the needs of others more climate friendly.  This is not a sustainable plan and it is being soundly rejected by the American public.

"So what?", clean energy may say.  "We'll force them to adopt our clean energy plans!"

Not so fast.  The American public holds title to land needed by the big Midwest wind-a-thon, and they're not giving up easily.  It's turning into a political clash of epic proportions, and the landowners and voters have dug in their heels for a long, messy battle.  Now clean energy must find a way to part land from landowner if it intends to move forward.

Is the CFRA's report on transmission opposition "issues" going to do the trick?  Probably not.

Will a couple of Fresh Energy executives playing the part of an impartial news source help?

Communications. To achieve results, we must move the national narrative around clean energy and climate. Stories that show the economic benefits of a clean energy economy and positive, science-based discussions about clean energy, climate, and health are keys to progress. Fresh Energy has expanded our commitment to become a clean energy communications leader, as producers of the regional online news site Midwest  Energy News and in debate-changing strategic communications efforts.
Fresh Energy's Midwest Energy News "is a news site and we don’t take policy positions," according to its editor.  However, here’s Fresh Energy’s “policy” on transmission:
Wind power is a major ingredient in the transition to a clean energy economy. But to make it work, we need transmission lines that
bring electricity from windy areas to urban centers. If we do it right, wind blowing on the Great Plains will keep the lights on in
Minneapolis, Chicago, and Detroit, creating new jobs, protecting our air and water, and reducing reliance on dirty coal power.  The Midwest’s transmission grid is managed by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), one of the largest transmission organizations in the world. Fresh Energy has been working with MISO and a network of partners to plan for 17 new multi-value transmission lines in the region, ensuring they are financed fairly and designed in a way that maximizes clean energy use and saves  customers money. A strong, regional transmission backbone reduces dependence on coal plants. Determining how transmission lines are sited and routed—and how  landowners are compensated—is a crucial step. With our technical knowledge and commitment to community livability, Fresh Energy is playing a key role in this process. As Fresh Energy and its partners continue the push for more clean energy in Minnesota and the upper Midwest,
we’re setting the stage for the next set of transmission lines
that will make or break our ability to fully harness the potential of the wind.
Take a look at what happened when Midwest Energy News published a glowing review of the CFRA report and a handful of landowners posted comments on the story. Landowners were challenged to answer the editor's argumentative questions, and had their own comments unfairly summarized and re-written by the editor.  Although he keeps determining that the discussion has "run its course," he just keeps coming back to have the last word.... 61 comments on the article and counting...

Did the Midwest Energy News editor's "conversation" with landowners help them see the light about clean energy?  Or did it just make them more determined to put a stop to what they see as short-sighted and unacceptable energy initiatives to build a coast-to-coast transmission "superhighway" to enable Enron-style energy trading?
  Or maybe they simply concluded that clean energy is a bully and a brat?

A true, sustainable, clean energy future is going to require thoughtful and empathetic leadership over the long term, and the patience to develop new technologies that provide real benefit to everyone.  Clean Energy is not yet mature.
0 Comments

Wind Wars - Talking Dollars and Sense

1/16/2014

10 Comments

 
The battle between renewables and fossil fuel generation has taught us all that it's good to be "green."  However, "green" comes in many shades.  There are also many internal battles going on inside the renewables world.  One of the most concerning is the "big wind" battle pitting onshore wind companies against offshore wind companies.

There's lots of money to be made by harnessing the wind.  It's a "free" resource, and our green-hungry society is clamoring to feel good about themselves by financially supporting it.

But all wind isn't good wind.  The idea behind "green" is that it's a sustainable resource.  A sustainable resource is one that is defined as "conserving an ecological balance by avoiding depletion of natural resources."

Onshore wind is not sustainable.  It requires the depletion of one of our most valuable resources, the  productive farmland that feeds and sustains us. It requires taking something from those less economically advantaged and politically connected and giving it to others with the right economic and political connections. Centralized onshore wind generation is taking over our farming communities with turbines and huge new transmission lines to feed it to far flung coastal cities thousands of miles away.  There, arrogant, urban environmentalists can feast hungrily on their expensive "green" energy, believing that they are helping sustain the planet.  Nothing could be further from the truth!

Offshore wind doesn't require new transmission rights of way across privately-held land.  It doesn't require much new land-based transmission at all.  The development will take place miles offshore and be fed to the coastal cities via a few new radial lines.  However, offshore wind has been blocked by economically and politically advantaged individuals who don't want distant wind turbines mucking up their sea views.  Instead, they would rather the rest of us suck it up and make a sacrifice to provide for their needs.

Onshore wind is much further along in the development process and is therefore less pricey than its offshore cousin.  However, onshore wind has reached the saturation point where billions must now be spent developing new transmission to serve it.  This brings us to the tipping point where we must decide our own energy future.

Will we finally move forward on offshore transmission located in our own back yards, or will we choose to spend just as much foisting the burden off on others by building new transmission for onshore wind?

Let's examine the economics of both proposals.

Onshore wind claims that its new transmission projects will provide 5000+ temporary construction jobs and 500+ operations jobs.  None of these suspiciously rounded claims are backed up by source data, so we can't be sure how they were calculated to determine their veracity.
  The jobs and economic benefits claimed by onshore wind are intended to be realized by the communities where the line is located.  For the example, that would be the states of Kansas, Missouri, Illinois and Indiana.  Coastal consumers buying this wind product would be sending their energy dollars to other states and into the pockets of foreign transmission project investors.

The U.S. Department of Energy just released comparable economic data for offshore wind.
  The data for offshore wind development off the mid-Atlantic coast predicts 6000+ temporary construction jobs and more than 2,300 operations jobs.  Offshore wind will keep your energy dollars at home in the mid-Atlantic region, providing jobs and economic benefits in the communities who consume the energy produced.

Local economic benefits from imported onshore wind:  0

Local economic benefits from local offshore wind:  $$$


The
choice is yours.

10 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.